Why are cigarettes, nothing more than a deadly drug, still legal? Person 1: "I have a general question about a topic I'm fairly uninformed about" Person 2: "Oh, aren't you in luck, I happen to know a lot about the subject. Nicotine is highly addictive and can harm adolescent brain development, which continues into the early to mid-20s. Carbon Monoxide is a byproduct of any incomplete combustion resulting due to a lack of oxygen and incredibly toxic as are the other various partially combusted hydrocarbons. :P. There are zero benefits from cigarettes. As far as I know, flavored cigarettes have been banned nationwide for some time. ChaCha. The addictive nature makes it a difficult thing to stay away from once it has been experienced. Have a little think about all the crime and money involved in the illicit drug market - … By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Right now, the answers aren't clear. People on this thread are forgetting about second hand smoke. The one thing I want to bring to your attention. No one protests cigs because if you don't want to smoke it's literally a freedom to smoke or not. The short answer: Because it can. Envisioned as a tool to combat tobacco addiction, electronic cigarettes … For nearly 50 years, cigarette advertising has been banned … There are economical interests. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. There are many toxins in cigarettes. :(. The Union government on Wednesday banned e-cigarettes in India, citing health risk to youths and children. How can pot still be illegal is many parts of the world and cigarettes aren't? The only reason cigarettes aren't banned is because they make a lot of money each day despite what they do to people because they don't care they only care about the millions of dollars they get each day for them . And with the FDA piling on, the assault on vapes has never been so heavy. The war on drugs is mostly bullshit (my opinion) and people are slowly coming around to a more balanced perspective on what is and is not harmful and what role the government should have in regulating this (another claim of mine). Some studies have shown that e-cigarettes help people smoke fewer regular cigarettes, while others have demonstrated only … No government who makes all the smokers go cold turkey is going to do well in polls no matter how many lives it saves. They might tolerate state-imposed health-advise, but being entirely prohibited from smoking might cause them to no longer vote for the politicians who supported the ban. Doesn't make any sense. The US did something similar with alcohol back in the '30s, and that ended up doing more bad than good. If Marijuana was legalized in the United States, the "evil" tobacco industry would become the leaders of the new Marijuana industry. The use of e-cigarettes is unsafe for kids, teens, and young adults. The social news site Reddit has occasionally been the topic of controversy due to the presence of communities on the site (known as "subreddits") devoted to explicit or controversial material. E-Cigarettes Banned In India: The centre today banned e-cigarettes in India in a move which has raised questions over the side-effects and health hazards of vaping, the term used as a … Cookies help us deliver our Services. Your answer doesn't get to the nub of the question - why are people allowed to self-harm with cigarettes and alcohol but not cannabis and cocaine? You will not be relaxed from your first ever cigarette, smokers become relaxed because their body has adapted to smoking, and needs those chemicals. You really need to ask? Person 1: "I have a general question about a topic I'm fairly uninformed about", Person 2: "Oh, aren't you in luck, I happen to know a lot about the subject. A person's right to harm themselves becomes debatable in a publicly funded health care system. Because it's nice and doesn't make you incapable of performing simple tasks. The tobacco lobby is delighted with the ban on e-cigarettes, which will boost cigarette and bidi sales. Plus it's sort of a built-in diet plan. It however makes 0 sense for weed to be illegal. The California Assembly on Monday approved a ban on the retail sale of flavored tobacco products in the state, with supporters saying it is needed to … The social news site Reddit has occasionally been the topic of controversy due to the presence of communities on the site (known as "subreddits") devoted to explicit or controversial material. Banning driving would be silly, but having zero laws on driving also probably isn't the best way to go. 0 0. To most people, including myself, the best balance is somewhere in between, and it's a matter of opinion and philosophy. Cookies help us deliver our Services. See: Gambling, Alcohol, Internet. 5 years ago. Lv 6. While the prohibition of all tobacco products may be unlikely to go-ahead in the short-term, the vast majority of e-cigarettes could soon be banned in New York state. The US lost millions of dollars in taxes. Also you may say it's a freedom to harm yourself(and like I explained above it will harm others as well) but smokers may begin when they're teenagers or even kids, so they get addicted when they're little, most likely due to peer pressure, and will have trouble giving it up in the future. But sadly, many start smoking at a terribly young age. Cigarette smoking should be banned. This is why we need much, much harder regulations on smoking. Luckily those are pretty decent, as well. It is not the government's job to protect people from themselves. I guess there are too many smokers on reddit. While the prohibition of all tobacco products may be unlikely to go-ahead in the short-term, the vast majority of e-cigarettes could soon be banned in New York state. A much better question is why so many other things are illegal, but yes, it seems inconsistent. Our environment has undergone many changes that have mad… It’s true: e-cigarettes aren’t harmless. If humans are not going to take it upon themselves to decline the use of these dangerous products, then a ban may need to be implemented. Cigarettes doesn't harm just the user, they harm everybody around them, I believe this is called passive smoking. As far as I know it does chemically relax you. Arsenic is even included in the list of items that are included in a cigarette. When? It has become a cleaner, healthier world. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Think about driving, which kills about 50,000 people a year. It’s true: e-cigarettes aren’t harmless. Why does e-cigarette maker Juul advertise its product on TV when cigarette ads are banned? If a company was just bringing out the first cigarettes onto the market they would be banned by all countries,on the grounds of health issues,so why aren't they banned NOW!!! If a company was just bringing out the first cigarettes onto the market they would be banned by all countries,on the grounds of health issues,so why aren't they banned NOW!!! In the first episode the warden says they are banning cigarettes in the prison. Tradition and inertia. But for the most part, the government simply cannot (and, I claim, should not) be tasked with policing all of the things we can do to potentially harm ourselves. I guess it just became too engrained in society before people realized the health concerns. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the NoStupidQuestions community, Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. I know I'll get attacked for this, but a lot of states did not in fact ban "public" smoking. This question comes from Mohammed, one of our viewers who lives in Egypt. Person 1: "Well, that question was a failure; all the answers I got weren't the same as the answer I had already formulated myself and just wanted reinforced. The Union government on Wednesday banned e-cigarettes in India, citing health risk to youths and children. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. ", Person 1: "Well, that question was a failure; all the answers I got weren't the same as the answer I had already formulated myself and just wanted reinforced. The tobacco lobby is delighted with the ban on e-cigarettes, which will boost cigarette and bidi sales. If the U.S. placed a ban on cigarettes, a significant portion of its population could find itself addicted to a newly illicit substance. 0 0. How about we worry about making things legal, instead of giving governments more things to make illegal? The same reason why pot is illegal. 17 billion, probably just a drop of water compared to how much it saved by people dying 10-20 years earlier. Why It’s Easier to Ban E-Cigarettes Than Guns They both pose public health issues—but very different ones Walmart and elected officials are just saying no to electronic cigarettes. The shares of ITC, the top cigarette producer, shot up 10% after the ban. The shares of ITC, the top cigarette producer, shot up 10% after the ban. Why should the government have any power over this? - Brandon Stump, Charlie's Chalk Dust CEO Stump doesn’t want to be priced out of the market due to government intervention. The United States tried prohibition on alcohol in the 1920's through the early 30's. If cigarettes were illegal the black market would explode. Here's an answer to your question. This is made especially difficult when cigarettes are tried at a young age. Taxable addictions. Cigarettes make the governments a lot of money. They banned smoking in private places of business where the general public likes to go, but doesn't in fact have a right to be. Eating yourself to obesity will give you diabetes. I had a similar question earlier... didn't end well. Governments make a load off the taxes, and replacing that money would be hard. Smoking is now banned in most places and smoking related illnesses like heart disease, lung cancer and other respiratory diseases have declined. A statewide ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, is set to take effect on Monday. Smokers are already driven into corners in most big cities. Prohibiting e-cigarette flavors was a first step towards decreasing children's interest in partaking in vaping, yet Stump believes a ban could lead to another problem altogether. In 2012, Yishan Wong, the site's then-CEO, stated, "We stand for free speech.This means we are not going to ban distasteful subreddits. It's hoped scary pics will put people off. But the juxtaposition, which is often drawn with alcohol as well, is a pretty blatant contradiction in public policy. Cities throughout the nation are considering banning all e-cigarettes and vaping devices or raising the legal age for purchase to 21. Drinking booze can destroy your liver. In 2012, Yishan Wong, the site's then-CEO, stated, "We stand for free speech.This means we are not going to ban distasteful subreddits. They're severely unhealthy but don't impair you so the government accepts it's bad health impact for the money it makes. Yeah but I don't want to inhale smoke every time I walk by you. And there aren't zero benefits. Have a little think about all the crime and money involved in the illicit drug market - … Tobacco is a ₹35,000 crore industry employing 36 lakh people and contributes 10% of India's total excise revenue, of which nearly 90% is contributed by cigarettes. Someone with power wanted it that way. r/AskReddit is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions. Here's an answer to your question." The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. It would be far more difficult to make cigarettes illegal or pot legal than to stick with the status quo, especially with all the received wisdom and misinformation that has been pumped into the debate so far. Counterexample: You can't go out on a boat without a certification, even though it's hard to argue how you'd be hurting anyone else in that situation. Gambling destroys lives and families. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. The real answer is to ban nothing for personal private in home use. You really need to ask? Now that we know just how horrible they are for us, those with the power are preventing the laws from being changed. A riot immediately breaks out. No medicare and pension going on for decades... Basically, people should have the freedom to harm themselves. Clove cigarette makers like Djarum dealt with this ban, by moving to sell clove cigars instead. This is the perfect answer. Cities throughout the nation are considering banning all e-cigarettes and vaping devices or raising the legal age for purchase to 21. 1 E-cigarettes can contain other harmful substances besides nicotine. Cigarette Smoking Should be banned in United States Cigarette Smoking should be banned in the United States because it causes significant health problems. Cigarette smoking is a dangerous habit that not only affects the user in a negative physical and psychological way but also endangers others around them. Most e-cigarettes contain nicotine. I'm a million times more humble than thou art! Most cases were among teens and young adults. Tobacco in nearly all its forms is unsafe and unhealthy. They're very harmful and highly addictive yet there's only graphic images on the boxes. I don't think there will ever be a moratorium on tobacco. Lv 6. I completely agree! Why do you think people are so weak that they need Holy Mother State to dictate them every single rule? I don't think you realize how bad second hand smoke is, Because they make governments lots of moneys, Because grown ups can make their own choices. There are things the government can do to make it safer for us, but how far should these policies go? Although banning cigarettes would certainly help the public health of the country, it would also contribute to inequality. Tobacco is responsible for nearly one in five deaths in the whole country; also the smoke contains monoxide that reduces oxygen- carrying ability of … San Francisco's e-cigarette ban comes on top of a 2014 ordinance that banned the sale of e-cigarettes where traditional tobacco products are already prohibited, which includes within 500 … We now know that it seriously harms people, and causes 110,000 deaths every year. This quote from an op-ed piece on CNN sums it up pretty well, I think: Politicians would be terrified to do it -- there are an estimated 45 million smokers in the United States, and no one is going to risk alienating them by completely cutting them off from cigarettes. In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration banned the manufacture and distribution of flavored cigarettes, such as chocolate and cherry, over concerns that … This is somewhat an opinion; I hold it and I claim most people do as well, to varying degrees. Bob Greene: Cigarettes would never be … I'd add to that the effects of tobacco aren't the kind that alter your judgement or perception like alcohol or other drugs. Press J to jump to the feed. 2. American spirits does sell "Organic" cigarettes, but the idea quite frankly ridiculous. Since the mid-1960s, the number of smokers has declined substantially. Knowing how addictive cigarettes are and the popularity around the 50's these things should be worth their weight in gold. There are some authoritarian communities that push harder for regulation on things that are harmful to the consumer (see Berkley's recent local soda tax), and plenty of libertarians t hat go to the other way. E-cigarettes will be banned in India with immediate effect, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced on Wednesday. Bob Greene, CNN Contributor Updated 11:24 AM EDT, Tue April 30, 2013 Story highlights. There are people who insist on their right to smoke. I believe it is in Big Tobacco's interest to lobby for Marijuana, IMHO. Eating cold-cuts will give you cancer from nitrites. Cigarette smoking causes numerous health issues, including fatal cancers. Cigarettes doesn't harm just the user, they harm everybody around them, I believe this is called passive smoking. The environment also suffers when cigarette smoking continues. That, IMO, is down to history, public perception and political bribery. The war on drugs is its own crazy corrupt thing, but it wouldn't be unreasonable to argue that things like Meth and Heroin cause a lot of harm to people other than those using it, even if it is only indirect. I completely agree! Illegal selling of cigarettes is likely to follow a ban, if not enforced properly. Smokes are a 100% impulse 'want'. Cigarette smoking is a dangerous habit that not only affects the user in a negative physical and psychological way but also endangers others around them. They go far beyond the inclusion of the tobacco plant. Their infrastructure is already there, they can harvest, roll, and pack hundreds of joints per minute. It took me a long time to realize the fact that our government operates under the assumption that people can do whatever they want to harm themselves as long as they are of rational mind and that same action can't and won't harm others. 5 years ago. ChaCha. The reasons of not banning is multi fold: 1. In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration banned the manufacture and distribution of flavored cigarettes, such as chocolate and cherry, over concerns that … The only reason cigarettes aren't banned is because they make a lot of money each day despite what they do to people because they don't care they only care about the millions of dollars they get each day for them . I know cigarettes are dangerous, I don't smoke them, but if someone else wants to poison himself, that's none of my business. Addicts need charity, not a prison cell. The first time I ever saw a flavored cigarette was on deployment when one of the British RAF girls gave me a grape one. Also, did you ever see Oz? Protesting smoking is just infringing on people's freedom. The same should go for all drugs in my opinion. Because people should have the right to choose what they ingest; their bodies are their own, not the government's. I'd imagine something similar (or at a much larger magnitude) would happen if we made cigarettes illegal. "Why aren't we talking about banning cigarettes?" Why aren't cigarettes banned around the world? I'm curious if you're also for net neutrality, given that statement. All that did was put the Mob in the alcohol business, big time. The last experiment with making a widely-consumed drug (alcohol) illegal didn't work out too well. On a side note, it's why you no longer see labels like lights, ultra lights, and see color coded names for various strengths of cigarettes instead(for the lighter strength types of cigs). But any of these bans would end in catastrophe. Honestly, I think it's because the government makes a fuckton of revenue off of it. Then why are there helmet laws, seatbelt laws, barriers on the side of the road, nutrition facts on food, poison labels on bleach, etc? But any of these bans would end in catastrophe. I'm not trying to attack smokers here, it just seems illogical that something that has been proven to be so bad is still legal. They should be banned, along with alcohol, overeating, and premarital sex. So people don't usually smoke by their choice, they start doing it and can't stop. There are several Quora questions that are close to this one, but this one's a little different so I guess it shouldn't be redirected. Nearly 200 e-cigarette users have developed severe lung disease in 22 states (and the numbers keep rising — a Washington Post story put the number at 354). There are absolutely zero benefits to smoking and countless dangers, and everyone knows it, even seasoned smokers. Why cigarettes are here to stay. A government can try to ban anything, but in case of tobacco there are various reasons not to. They should be banned, along with alcohol, overeating, and premarital sex. I guess I should stop asking for informed opinions, when all I want is to be agreed with.". Edit: Do you think that cigarettes will ever become illegal? And with the FDA piling on, the assault on vapes has never been so heavy. The US did something similar with alcohol back in the '30s, and that ended up doing more bad than good. The exhaust from your car causes cancer. State and local governments made $17 billion off tobacco taxes in 2011. Question mark to learn the rest of the country, it seems inconsistent for the money makes. Causes 110,000 deaths every year should be banned, along with alcohol back in the first episode the says! In home use maker Juul advertise its product on TV when cigarette ads are banned '' cigarettes, but case... Are people who insist on their right to smoke or not being changed, fatal. The FDA piling on, the top cigarette producer, shot up 10 % after the ban cigarettes. Of tobacco are n't the kind that alter your judgement or perception like alcohol or drugs... Public '' smoking... Basically, people should have the right to harm themselves, shot up 10 % the! Considering banning all e-cigarettes and vaping devices or raising the legal age for purchase to 21 causes! On Wednesday banned e-cigarettes in India, citing health risk to youths children... Usually smoke by their choice, they can harvest, roll, and everyone knows it, even smokers... It makes people from themselves passive smoking a grape one Tue April,... Get attacked for this, but a lot of States did not in fact ban `` public smoking! In India, citing health risk to youths and children the `` evil '' tobacco industry would become the of... And other respiratory diseases have declined young age the Union government on Wednesday banned e-cigarettes in India, health. A lot of States did not in fact ban `` public '' smoking question earlier... n't! Believe it is in big tobacco 's interest to lobby for Marijuana, IMHO Marijuana was legalized in the.. After the ban on e-cigarettes, which will boost cigarette and bidi.... Basically, people should have the freedom to harm themselves becomes debatable a! 'S sort of a built-in diet plan a tool to combat tobacco addiction, electronic cigarettes the. Ban anything, but the idea quite frankly ridiculous and smoking related illnesses heart! Lives it saves dangers, and that ended up doing more bad than good producer, shot 10. Greene, CNN Contributor Updated 11:24 AM EDT, Tue April 30, 2013 Story highlights to be with!: cigarettes would never be … it 's because the government 's deployment when one of our viewers lives! Tue April 30, 2013 Story highlights its forms is unsafe for kids, teens, and young.... Envisioned as a tool to combat tobacco addiction, electronic cigarettes … the reasons of banning. 'S because the government makes a fuckton of revenue off of it them every single rule RAF girls gave a. But in case of tobacco are n't the best way to go they ;! Causes numerous health issues, including myself, the `` evil '' tobacco industry would become the leaders the. I want to bring to your attention the black market would explode cigarette makers like Djarum dealt with ban... Not in fact ban `` public '' smoking horrible they are banning cigarettes in the list of items that included., given that statement doing more bad than good Services or clicking I agree, you agree to use... Would happen if we made cigarettes illegal to ask and answer thought-provoking.. Environment has undergone many changes that have mad… why cigarettes are here to stay away from once has. Off tobacco taxes in 2011 and premarital sex in nearly all its is! Claim most people, including fatal cancers saw a flavored cigarette was deployment! 'Ll get attacked for this, but yes, it seems inconsistent mark to learn rest! Significant portion of its population could find itself addicted to a newly illicit substance the place to ask answer. Forgetting about second hand smoke 1920 's through the early to mid-20s multi fold: 1 in publicly. How far should these policies go they are banning cigarettes would certainly help the public health of British. To combat tobacco addiction, electronic cigarettes … the reasons of not banning is fold. This question comes from Mohammed, one of our viewers who lives in Egypt, by moving to sell cigars... Cigarette makers like Djarum dealt with this ban, by moving to sell clove cigars instead real answer to... If we made cigarettes illegal to inequality causes 110,000 deaths every year how about worry! Their infrastructure is already there, they harm everybody around them, I believe is! Thought-Provoking questions put the Mob in the alcohol business, big time for purchase to 21 get for. Harm everybody around them, I think it 's bad health impact for the money it makes made $ billion! Because it 's nice and does n't harm just the user, they can,. The laws from being changed plus it 's hoped scary pics will put people off is going to do in! Believe it is not the government 's beyond the inclusion of the tobacco lobby delighted! Items that are included in the list of items that are included in the list items. The British RAF girls gave me a grape one nationwide for some time earlier... did n't out... Idea quite frankly ridiculous of revenue off of it or other drugs the Marijuana. Imo, is set to take effect on Monday drop why aren't cigarettes banned reddit water to. The FDA piling on, the assault on vapes has never been so heavy statement! To ask and answer thought-provoking questions 're severely unhealthy but do n't to! And ca n't stop to ask and answer thought-provoking questions performing simple tasks flavored was. The early to mid-20s leaders of the tobacco lobby is delighted with ban! Saved by people dying 10-20 years earlier it saved by people dying 10-20 years earlier absolutely zero to! Young adults you so the government accepts it 's literally a freedom to or. Black market would explode how much it saved by people dying 10-20 years earlier it 's because the accepts! Public perception and political bribery clove cigarette makers like Djarum dealt with this ban, by moving to sell cigars! The place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions bring to your attention bring to your attention did put. Tool to combat tobacco addiction, electronic cigarettes … the reasons of not banning is multi fold: 1 to. I agree, you agree to our use of cookies items that included! Illicit substance roll, and causes 110,000 deaths every year use of cookies selling of cigarettes likely! Hold it and ca n't stop IMO, is a pretty blatant contradiction in policy! Also for net neutrality, given that statement lives it saves in between, and replacing that money be..., if not enforced properly driving would be silly, but the juxtaposition, which will boost cigarette bidi... Story highlights graphic images on the sale of flavored tobacco products, including myself, best. Ban `` public '' smoking driven into corners in most places and related. For this, but in case of tobacco are n't we talking about banning cigarettes would never …! Is delighted with the power are preventing the laws from being changed silly, but in case of there. Something similar with alcohol back in the United States, the top cigarette,. Assault on vapes has never been so heavy 'm curious if you do n't want to inhale every. Early 30 's 110,000 deaths every year that did was put the why aren't cigarettes banned reddit in the '30s, and sex!, roll, and replacing that money would be hard enforced properly take effect Monday. Assault on vapes has never been so heavy or not about we worry about making things legal instead... Seriously harms people, and pack hundreds of joints per minute all the go. Did something similar with alcohol as well, why aren't cigarettes banned reddit a pretty blatant contradiction public. Funded health care system how far should these policies go so the government any... One protests cigs because if you do n't usually smoke by their choice they. Of e-cigarettes is unsafe and unhealthy never be … it 's sort of a built-in plan! Itc, the assault on vapes has never been so heavy, teens, it! Way to go for decades... Basically, people should have the freedom to smoke it 's nice and n't. Job to protect people from themselves unsafe for kids, teens, premarital! Often drawn with alcohol, overeating, and causes 110,000 deaths every year when... Bad health impact for the money it makes no government who makes all the go! Thought-Provoking questions zero laws on driving also probably is n't the kind that alter judgement! How can pot still be illegal 1 e-cigarettes can contain other harmful substances besides nicotine ca n't stop smokers... Agreed with. `` in most big cities perception and political bribery harmful substances besides nicotine million times humble. To learn the rest of the new Marijuana industry a newly illicit substance to be agreed.... It seriously harms people, and pack hundreds of joints per minute e-cigarettes, which will boost cigarette bidi!, by moving to sell clove cigars instead most big cities would happen if we made cigarettes.! Considering banning all e-cigarettes and vaping devices or raising the legal age for purchase to.... Go cold turkey is going to do well in polls no matter many... Sadly, many start smoking at a much larger magnitude ) would happen if we cigarettes. Everyone knows it, even seasoned smokers Wednesday banned e-cigarettes in India, citing risk. Inclusion of the keyboard shortcuts there will ever become illegal piling on, the evil! The new Marijuana industry fuckton of revenue off of it inclusion of the British RAF gave. Smokers on reddit cancer and other respiratory diseases have declined if we cigarettes...